翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Plant peptide hormone ・ Plant perception ・ Plant perception (paranormal) ・ Plant perception (physiology) ・ Plant physiology ・ Plant Physiology (journal) ・ Plant propagation ・ Plant Protection Act ・ Plant Protection and Quarantine ・ Plant Proteome Database ・ Plant quarantine ・ Plant Quarantine Act ・ Plant reproduction ・ Plant reproductive morphology ・ Plant Resources of Tropical Africa ・ Plant rights ・ Plant Scherer ・ Plant secondary metabolism ・ Plant secretory tissue ・ Plant seed peroxygenase ・ Plant seed proteins ・ Plant senescence ・ Plant Simulation ・ Plant small nucleolar RNA R71 ・ Plant sources of anti-cancer agents ・ Plant stanol ester ・ Plant stanols ・ Plant stem ・ Plant stem cell ・ Plant stress measurement Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Plant rights ： ウィキペディア英語版 Plant rights Plant rights are rights to which plants may be entitled. Such issues are often raised in connection with discussions about human rights, animal rights, biocentrism, or sentiocentrism. ==Philosophy== On the question of whether animal rights can be extended to plants, philosopher Tom Regan argues that animals acquire rights due to being aware, what he calls "subjects-of-a-life". He argues that this does not apply to plants, and that even if plants did have rights, abstaining from eating meat would still be moral due to the use of plants to rear animals. According to philosopher Michael Marder, the idea that plants should have rights derives from "plant subjectivity", which is distinct from human personhood.〔http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/2013120141156284755.html〕 Philosopher Paul Taylor holds that all life has inherent worth and argues for respect for plants, but does not assign them rights. Christopher D. Stone, the son of investigative journalist I. F. Stone, proposed in a 1972 paper titled "Should Trees Have Standing?" that if corporations are assigned rights, so should natural objects such as trees. Whilst not appealing directly to "rights", Matthew Hall has argued that plants should be included within the realm of human moral consideration. His "Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany" discusses the moral background of plants in western philosophy and contrasts this with other traditions, including indigenous cultures, which recognise plants as persons—active, intelligent beings that are appropriate recipients of respect and care. Hall backs up his call for the ethical consideration of plants with arguments based on plant neurobiology, which says that plants are autonomous, perceptive organisms capable of complex, adaptive behaviours, including the recognition of self/non-self. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Plant rights」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.